Date Posted:
08 | 15 | 05

Less Is More, But It Might Still Be Less Overall

Clear Channel's "Less Is More" initiative makes headlines today on CNN/Money. You can read their thoughts here.

My opinion is that Less Is More could still end up being less overall.

"If it's not compelling, does it really matter how few commercials interrupt it?"

It's true that lowering spot loads means less listener frustration due to program interruption. But the bottom line still is - and will always be - the quality of the program that was interrupted. If it's not compelling, does it really matter how few commercials interrupt it?

Content is King.

Less Is More will only succeed if it is part of an overall effort to improve the quality of the More. Better radio with fewer ads will work. Lowering spot loads to compensate for lackluster programming will not.

Colophon:

  • I designed and coded this website using just a text-editor and a whole lot of patience. It's powered by Movable Type and hosted by Dreamhost.

  • All opinions expressed here are mine and do not represent any other person or entity. You know how it goes.

  • If you have any comments, get in touch. I'd love to hear them.

  • All Content © 2003-2008

Think About It:

  • Win An On Air Gig!:   I think the idea is brilliant. It was brilliant long before shows like American Idol came along, and lots of great broadcasters were discovered this way.

  • Dear CHR Program Director:   Unless your station is owned by the makers of Tylenol, Advil, or Bayer, you've got a problem. It's your processing.

  • Net Marketing:   Opportunities to turn passive listeners into active ones abound. But we miss these opportunities because we are woefully out of date. Or worse, we seize opportunities and then fail to follow through.

In The Archives: