Date Posted:
08 | 15 | 05

Less Is More, But It Might Still Be Less Overall

Clear Channel's "Less Is More" initiative makes headlines today on CNN/Money. You can read their thoughts here.

My opinion is that Less Is More could still end up being less overall.

"If it's not compelling, does it really matter how few commercials interrupt it?"

It's true that lowering spot loads means less listener frustration due to program interruption. But the bottom line still is - and will always be - the quality of the program that was interrupted. If it's not compelling, does it really matter how few commercials interrupt it?

Content is King.

Less Is More will only succeed if it is part of an overall effort to improve the quality of the More. Better radio with fewer ads will work. Lowering spot loads to compensate for lackluster programming will not.

Colophon:

  • I designed and coded this website using just a text-editor and a whole lot of patience. It's powered by Movable Type and hosted by Dreamhost.

  • All opinions expressed here are mine and do not represent any other person or entity. You know how it goes.

  • If you have any comments, get in touch. I'd love to hear them.

  • All Content © 2003-2010

Think About It:

  • The Gamblers: Anatomy Of An Implosion, Kenny Rogers' Style:   One might think driving down the rate card while building massive debt would be the most ignorant of ignorant decisions... but Clear Channel saw the ignorant hand they'd dealt themselves and raised the entire industry a stupid.

  • Private Investment:   Terrestrial radio is only special so long as the content on terrestrial radio is special. Once it isn't... it isn't. And that's it.

  • Portable People Meter Teasers:   If you're on a date with a woman and you realize she's nothing but a tease, are you going to bother seeing her again? Why would we want our radio stations to become the embodiment of a bad date?

In The Archives: